Prof. Dr. Denis Laborde | Chercheur

Mobilität, Migration und räumliche Neuordnung
Centre Marc Bloch, Friedrichstraße 191, D-10117 Berlin
Email: denis.laborde  ( at )  cmb.hu-berlin.de Tél: (+49) 030 / 2093 / 70713

Position : Directeur de recherche CNRS | Discipline : Musicologie | former Départment : Plateforme « Musique – Anthropologie – Globalisation »

Biographie

Après des études au Conservatoire National Supérieur de Musique de Paris, Denis Laborde enseigne en conservatoire et dirige à Radio France la création mondiale des Crystal Psalms d’Alvin Curran (New Albion Records). Il découvre l’anthropologie, prépare un doctorat de l’EHESS sur les improvisations poético-musicales du bertsulari basque (Nicole Belmont). Devenu rédacteur en chef de la revue Ethnologie française, il entre au CNRS (LAIOS). Nommé à Göttingen (MHFA – Max Planck Institut für Geschichte) puis à Berlin (Centre Marc Bloch), il organise un réseau international de recherche sur les Musiques du Monde. A son retour, il intègre le Centre Georg Simmel et est élu à une direction d’études à l’EHESS. En 2017, il fonde à Bayonne l’Institut ARI-CNRS. Depuis le 1er septembre 2023, il est chercheur au Centre Marc Bloch (Berlin) où il dirige l’équipe « Mobilités, Migrations, Recomposition des espaces » et pilote l’IRN du CNRS Of What is Music Capable in Situation of Forced Migration. En 2020, il a été honoré de la Médaille d’Argent du CNRS.

Denis Laborde fait de la musique un outil d’analyse des sociétés humaines. Il concentre son attention  sur les situations, emprunte à l’anthropologie sociale ses appuis théoriques, nourrit un dialogue permanent avec l’histoire, la philosophie et une sociologie d’inspiration pragmatiste.  Dans le  répertoire traditionnel basque comme dans les mondes du jazz, il s’intéresse à la façon  dont  un musicien ou une musicienne érige l’environ-nement en ressource d’action. Il démontre alors que, bien loin d’être un jeu de hasard, l’improvisation est un jeu d’adresse : on ne s’improvise pas improvisateur (La mémoire et l’instant ; Thelonious Monk, sculpteur de silence). Son intérêt pour l’analyse situationnelle le conduit à interroger des situations à conflit déclaré, en particulier les dénonciations de blasphème (Bach à Leipzig, vendredi saint de 1729 ; The unbearable sound: the strange career of musicoclashes, MIT Press ; « Écouter la musique, c’est un grave péché », Genève).

La réflexion qu’il mène en Allemagne avec Patrice Veit sur les lieux de musique le conduit à travailler sur les figures du savoir et les institutions culturelles. Il coordonne plusieurs publications (Allemagne, l’interrogation, avec Alf Lüdtke; Erinnerung und Gesellschaft, Maurice  Halbwachs  (1877-  1945) avec Hermann Krapoth; Désirs d’histoire avec Michael Werner; Le Cas Royaumont, Paris).

Puis il fonde à Bayonne l’Institut ARI au moment où cette ville devient une porte d’entrée pour des migrants :  12 000 personnes accueillies sur place en une année. Le besoin d’intelligibilité qui émane de la société civile l’incite à consacrer ses recherches à la façon dont la fabrication de musique accompagne celles et ceux qui se trouvent en situation de migration forcée tout au long de leur périple (Migrants Musiciens, Genève) : pourquoi de la musique en de telles circonstances ? et que produit cette fabrication de musique ? Avec l’Institut Convergences Migrations, puis avec Columbia University et le Center for World Music de Hildesheim, il structure des projets internationaux sur ce thème. Avec ses doctorants, il crée une forme originale d’écriture scientifique : le festival Haizebegi, Art – Science – Société : des concerts, des films, des ateliers, des colloques, des rencontres qui permettent à des musiciens et aux spectateurs les plus divers de partager cette libido sciendi qui anime ces chercheurs qui, comme lui, font de la musique un outil d’intelligence des sociétés humaines.

Sujet de recherche

Voir ma production scientifique.

Institution de la thèse
LAIOS – EHESS

(IRN) Musi-Mig: Of What is Music Capable in Situations of Forced Migrations

The great challenge of IRN Musi-Mig is to bring together distant fields of research related to “music” in a shared dynamic of questioning. We bring them together here in the context of the power of music - or, more precisely, of making music together - to affect social bonds in situations of forced migration. We believe that brought together in a shared questioning, these distinct themes can produce the unexpected and be a source of renewed thinking on the role of cultural practices in situations of forced migration on a globalized scale.

We, therefore, target the reasons for acting "in the name of music" and the differentiated modalities of engagement in situations of music making. The basis of the project is a point of method that we have tested in our previous work: an observation work carried out in a contextualized and situated way, which also mobilizes the resources of filmic analysis.

The objective of the IRN

Four work axes are privileged, which draw as many situations or "institutional characters" as we analyze by case. In this context, the disparity of the situations is an asset to think this casuistry and trying to organize a rise in generality from these multi-situated observations, which aim to integrate into our analyses the internationalization of the question of asylum:

- (i) Activist commitments: What is acting in the name of the music? Here we compare situations in which NGOs propose musical activities in conditions of great precariousness: refugee camps (Moria, Zaatari, Kakuma), various CADAs, and reception structures for victims of natural catastrophes (New York). What does the musician's action in common do in these cases? How is the question of musical repertoires considered? Is music a tool for resilience, training, or a tool for cultural domination that would involve the establishment of a process of vicariousness?

- (ii) Cultural facilities have been built to accommodate (and produce) musical diversity. This is the case with the great festivals of Cape Coast, Rudolstadt, Hanover, New York. It is also the case of the buildings dedicated to fabricating a multicultural society. The Fort d'Aubervilliers is a paradigmatic case: an entire urban renovation program is built around the theater, programming, and mediation activities of the Villes des Musiques du Monde festival, which the public authorities have turned into a tool for social inclusion.

- (iii) Creative networks, most of them informal, are creating new urban dynamics centered on the reception and integration of asylum seekers in innovative participative approaches. What impact does this solidarity activism have on the lives of migrants who get involved in a musical project? And how does the social world that accompanies them change? The case studies are in New York, London, Berlin, and San Sebastian.

- (iv) Institutional arrangements. This time we shift our attention to institutions, focusing on the integrative force of cultural and educational policies, considered from the point of view of emotional mobilizations and musical capabilities but also the point of view of the status and legal frameworks of integration through artistic practice.

On each occasion, we examine how music is used to act on situations, to transform them in an inclusive, participatory, and virtuous way. Let us specify that these virtues are not to be sought in the music "itself" (which can also be an instrument of torture) but in the action in common and in the disposition in which the participants find themselves to believe in the virtue of the musical practice (it is up to the researchers to evaluate the criteriology and the forms of implementation in the situations).

The strength of the team

Internationally renowned scientists are part of this network. All the researchers involved in the network have already worked together, and the fieldwork is carried out within the framework of projects that have already been funded. The serialization of these case studies should allow us to lay the foundations for a generalization that will allow us to better grasp the importance of cultural practices in situations of forced migration and to grasp them in a reflexive form that questions the sustainability of social inclusion policies on a now globalized scale.

Activities

We privilege five modes of operation: 1. meetings of the Scientific Council (the project leaders of each team) twice a year at the ARI Institute; 2. an introductory conference explicitly devoted to questions of method and epistemology; 3. four other annual conferences devoted to each of the four themes of this project, organized by the partners; 4. An annual meeting on the theme of Art and Social Sciences to organize the international cooperation that will accompany the broad scientific program to create an incubator for artistic and scientific projects aimed at creating a framework for the ERC Synergy Grant project.

Objective

The IRN will strengthen the incubator for scientific research and artistic creation for cultural projects with a social vocation that is being created in Bayonne. It will ensure an international influence, not only in terms of visibility but also in terms of replicating the modalities of doing research experimentally. The IRN MusiCap will produce: (i) 11 publications over the next 5 years; (ii) a dedicated website with Pic-Digital (France Relance project with the company Pic-Digital); (iii) an involvement in the Haizebegi Festival in order to make this work known (www.haizebegi.eu); (iv) the ARI Institute has a documentary film team under the direction of Alexandra ENA (director, CNRS Image). Short films (5 min.) will be put online on the website, and a 52 minutes documentary film will be made on the project (funding acquired)

 The IRN is an unrivalled tool for allowing an internationalization of research for units that are far from the major centers of scientific production.

Team members & Institutes:

FRANCE – Prof. Denis LABORDE, Social Anthropology, Centre Marc Bloch, Berlin ; GHANA – Dr. Eric Debrah OTCHERE, Ethnomusicology, University of Cape Coast, Music and Dance Department Cape Coast; USA – Prof. Alessandra CIUCCI, Ethnomusicology, Columbia University, The Department of Music, New York, USA; GREAT BRITAIN - Prof. Martin STOKES, Ethnomusicology, London University, King’s College, London; GREAT BRITAIN - Dr. Hélène NEVEU KRINGELBACH, Anthropology, University College London, African Studies Research Center Gower Street, London; THE NETHERLANDS – Prof. Robert KLOOSTERMAN, Economic Geography, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research, Amsterdam; GERMANY – Dr. Habil. Michael FUHR, Ethnomusicology, Center for World Music Universität Hildesheim (Germany); SWITZERLAND – Prof. Monika SALZBRUNN, Ethnology, Université de Lausanne, Institut de Sciences Sociales des Religions Anthropole, Lausanne (Suisse) ; SPAIN – Dr. Aitzpea LEIZAOLA, Ethnology, Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea, Saint-Sébastien ; CHILE – Dr. Marisol FACUSE MUÑOZ, Sociology, Universidad de Chile, Santiago de Chile.

A Radical Concern: Advocacy for an Ingenious Anthropology of Music

24 septembre 2024

Denis Laborde

Anthropologie

Edition: New Diversities

https://newdiversities.mmg.mpg.de/?page_id=22776

https://hal.science/hal-04708375

In three steps, this paper suggests erecting ingenuity as a tool of investigation: Ethnomusicology in migration contexts, Strategies and tactics, Categorical assignments. Ingenuity is not to be understood as a gap in epistemic devices but as an instrument that unleashes the gaze, as a tool that aims to ensure the accuracy of observation reports, and especially as a generator of indignation that may take us out of our “comfort zone.” A comfort zone is to be understood here as a knowledge configuration that encourages us to think from established categories that assign people to the place provided for them by existing devices, forgetting to take into account the ways these categories are instituted. This leads us to pay attention to the “categorical service” that ethnomusicology’s conceptual frameworks provide to our ways of thinking.