Dr. Noa Levin | Chercheuse associée

Environnement, climat, énergie : les sociétés face aux défis écologiques
Centre Marc Bloch, Friedrichstraße 191, D-10117 Berlin

Institution principale : Università della Svizzera italiana | Discipline : Philosophie , Architecture |

Biographie

Noa Levin est chercheuse postdoctorale en philosophie et théorie de l'architecture et de l'environnement à l'Università della Svizzera italiana et chercheuse associée au Centre Marc Bloch. Ses recherches portent sur la politique du changement climatique et la théorie des médias environnementaux.

Elle est titulaire d'un doctorat du Centre of Research in Modern European Philosophy de l'université de Kingston, à Londres, après avoir obtenu une maîtrise en culture et littérature européennes en tant que Gates Scholar à l'université de Cambridge, et une licence en philosophie et cinéma à l'université de Tel-Aviv. 

Sujet de recherche

La recherche de Noa Levin porte sur la politique du changement climatique et explore ce thème à la fois dans une perspective philosophique et dans une perspective spatiale et écologique. 
Son projet postdoctoral à l'Académie d'architecture, financé par le Fondo Istituzionale per la Ricerca (FIR), porte sur les "communautés thermiques en temps de crise climatique" à travers l'exemple de la ville de Berlin.

Titre de la thèse
Living Mirrors of the Universe: Expression and Perspectivism in Benjamin and Deleuze after Leibniz
Résumé de la thèse

This thesis argues for the significance of G.W Leibniz’s concepts of ‘expression’ and ‘force’ and ‘perspective’ to the writings of Walter Benjamin and Gilles Deleuze. By triangulating the philosophical projects of Benjamin, Deleuze and Leibniz, the thesis opens up new perspectives and provides new readings of all three. Designating a structure of relations in which every simple substance or monad serves as a ‘living mirror’ of the universe, Leibniz’s concept of ‘expression’ denotes virtual inclusion or immanence. His concept of ‘force’ denotes the self-incurred drive that motivates the monad to action, while his ‘perspectivism’ defines the monads individuality through their infinite points of view on the world. Deleuze and Benjamin, I suggest, appropriate Leibniz’s concepts as part of their respective critiques of epistemology, which target Kant’s conception of experience as a hierarchic relation of representation, allowing them  to redefine experience as non-hierarchal, de-centred and embodied. At the same time, for both, Leibniz’s philosophy serves to criticize historicist views of chronological time. Leibniz’s perspectivism is reformulated by Deleuze and Benjamin as part of their respective critical theories of the image, culminating in their later formulations of the ‘dialectical’ and ‘crystal’ image, respectively. The conclusion however, highlights the diverging paths formed by their returns to Leibniz. Benjamin develops a politically effective ‘historical perspectivism’ in which the discontinuity of history enables ‘true historical time’ to replace chronological time. Deleuze, on the other hand, opts for an a-historical pure form of temporality, his ‘mannerist perspectivism’ describing a continuous, perpetually repeated ‘becoming’.

Institution de la thèse
Centre for Research in Modern European Philosophy (CRMEP) Kingston University, London
Directeur de thèse
Prof. Peter Osborne
Organisation de manifestations

7/2019 ‘Übersetzungen von Gewalt’ workshop on Walter Benjamins ‘Zur Kritik der Gewalt’, supported by Centre Marc Bloch and ZfL, Berlin.

6/2017 ‘Benjamin and Leibniz: On Expression’ workshop, supported by Goldsmiths University of London, The London Graduate School, and CRMEP at Kingston University.

Catastrophe et technologie. Théoriser la crise climatique avec Benjamin et Arendt

Le projet se concentre sur les théories des catastrophes technologiques de Walter Benjamin et Hannah Arendt. Les deux auteurs considèrent la modernité comme un âge de crise, et mettent en garde des conséquences violentes imminentes de la guerre technologique moderne. Pourtant, leurs points de vue différents sur l'histoire distinguent leurs perspectives et leurs théories. Dans le projet, je montre que les textes des deux auteurs sont particulièrement adaptés pour éclairer le rôle des êtres humains dans le développement des technologies qui ont provoqué la crise climatique actuelle.

 

Benjamin, Deleuze and the Baroque The Early Modern Origins of Media Theory

06 février 2025

Noa Levin

Politische Philosophie

Edition: 1st
ISBN: 9781350414211

For Walter Benjamin and Gilles Deleuze, who both authored seminal theoretical works on early cinema and photography, the history of modern media begins much earlier, in Baroque culture and science. Benjamin, Deleuze and the Baroque argues that their media theories were informed by their respective readings of the philosophy and mathematics of G.W. Leibniz, and the Baroque can thus be seen as the locus of modern media.
By critically comparing Benjamin and Deleuze's interpretations of the Baroque, Levin demonstrates the extent to which their theories of visual culture are intertwined with critiques of Enlightenment historiography and politics. Using a hermeneutic comparative approach, this book argues that the juxtaposition of Benjamin's reception of Leibniz with Deleuze's highlights the extent to which both authors' theories of image and media were informed by Leibniz's concepts of expression and perspectivism, themselves inspired by ground-breaking evolutions in optics and perspective. Providing close readings of Deleuze's The Fold and Benjamin's Origin of the German Trauerspiel, which remain understudied in the English language, it explores how, in their dual roles of philosopher and cultural critic, the pair may illuminate our own age of multiple crises through the Baroque.

Table of Contents

Introduction
I. A Strange Encounter
II. Redefining the Baroque
III. Leibniz, Paradigmatic Baroque Philosopher

Chapter 1: Of Monads and Mirrors: Leibniz's Monad in Deleuze and Benjamin
1.1 The Structure of Expression
1.2 Leibniz's Two Labyrinths
1.3 A Forbidden Tradition
1.4 Continuity of Knowledge and Experience

Chapter 2: Infinite Tasks of Learning: The Baroque-Inspired Critical Epistemologies of Benjamin and Deleuze
2.1 Infinite Analysis
2.2 Refiguring the Idea
2.3 The Concept of Origin
2.4 Minute Perceptions
2.5 Learning as Recollection

Chapter 3: Forces of History and Spectres of Return: The Baroque as Origin of Enlightenment Politics and Historicisms
3.1 Leibniz's Concepts of Force and Historical Progress
3.2 Virtual Histories and Infinite Totalities
3.3 Force and Violence in Origin of the German Trauerspiel
3.4 Apokatastasis and Eternal Return
3.5 Benjamin and Mallarmé on Chance and Probability

Chapter 4: It's All about Perspective: The Body Politics of the Baroque Image
4.1 Benjamin's Monadic Montage
4.2 Leibniz's Conceptions of Image and Perspective
4.3 Perspectivism and Mannerism
4.4 Allegory and Symbol
4.4 Perception and Body

Chapter 5: From the Crystal Palace to Cinematic Crystals: The Baroque Optic as Pre-cinematic Form
5.1 Between the Dialectical Image and the Crystal-Image
5.2 Deleuze and Benjamin on Montage and Montrage
5.3 The Crystal Pyramid, Leibniz's Theodicy

Conclusion


Publications

Noa Levin. Benjamin, Deleuze and the Baroque: The Early Modern Origins of Media Theory. Walter Benjamin Studies, Bloomsbury Publishing, forthcoming in February 2025.

Noa Levin, Julian Raffetseder and Sascha Roeseler. ‘Governing Access to Sun and Shade: Urban Microclimates as Commons in Vienna and Berlin’, proceedings from the ‘Urban Futures - Cultural Pasts’ conference, Barcelona 2024, forthcoming in 2025.

Noa Levin. ‘Stargazing with Benjamin: Early Modern Science and Alienation from Nature’. The Secret Agreement. Ancient and Medieval Sources in Walter Benjamin. Eds.  Leonardo Arigone, Elsa Costa, University of Delaware Press, forthcoming in 2025.

Mosè Commeta and Noa Levin. ‘Spatialité en marxisme’, Penser les spatialités,ed. Calbérac et al, forthcoming in 2025.

_______. ‘Walter Benjamin’s Environmental Critique: An Ecofeminist Reading of One-Way Street’ (article under review).

Steyerl, Hito and Levin, Noa. ‘Hot Takes: Image Production in Times of Climate Crisis, Noa Levin in Conversation with Hito Steyerl’. Foam, all about photography, Issue 66, May 2024.

Rebecca L. Stein, Noa Levin, Andrew Fisher. ‘The visual terms of state violence in Israel/Palestine: An interview with Rebecca L. Stein’. Philosophy of Photography 14.1, 2024.

Noa Levin. Book review essay: City, Climate and Architecture; Coping with Urban Climates. Urban Studies60(13), 2725-2730, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980231168300.

_______. ‘Specters of Eternal Return: Benjamin and Deleuze Read Leibniz’. Filozofski vestnik, Special Issue on “World”, 2021.

_______.Review of Thomas Nail, Theory of the ImagePhilosophy of Photography, Volume 11 Numbers 1 & 2, 2020.

_______. ‘Montage Mahagonny: Walter Benjamin and Bertolt Brecht's Theatre of Interruptions’. Material und Begriff. Arbeitsverfahren und theoretische Beziehungen Walter Benjamins, (Hamburg: Argument) 2019.