Moritz Gansen | Associate Postgraduate
Home Institution
:
Zentrum für Literatur- und Kulturforschung, Berlin; Institut für Philosophie, Technische Universität Darmstadt
|
Position
:
PhD student
|
Disciplines
:
Philosophy
|
Biography
MA Philosophy, Free University of Berlin
MA Critical and Creative Analysis, Goldsmiths, University of London
BA English and American Studies, Philosophy, University of Freiburg
Title of thesis
Receptions and Transformations of Pragmatism in French PhilosophyInstitution of thesis
Supervisor
Receptions and Transformations of Pragmatism in French Philosophy
The early 20th century bore witness to vibrant transatlantic travels of ideas, and in France, the controversy surrounding Anglo-American pragmatism soon took center stage. In 1913, Émile Durkheim opened his lecture on Pragmatism and Sociology at the Sorbonne in which he investigated a then still somewhat recent philosophical tendency that sought to evaluate concepts with regard to their practical effects. According to Durkheim, pragmatism would not only challenge traditional rationalism, but also French culture and philosophy in general. “If pragmatism were valid,” he concluded, “we should have to embark upon a complete reversal of this whole tradition.” Durkheim’s choice of words reflects a sense of irritation that pragmatism caused across some spheres of European thinking.
However, while some perceived it as a threat, others saw pragmatism as a chance for renewal, a means to develop an “image of thought” that would better suit the reality of subjectivities constituted in the world (and not in an abstract space of radicalized doubt). More than 50 years later, in an essay titled “On the Superiority of Anglo-American Literature,” for instance, Gilles Deleuze remarked that in his personal philosophical upbringing, the most important philosopher in France besides Sartre was Jean Wahl, who had introduced his generation to English and American thought. Deleuze’s characterization of the French reception of pragmatism and Anglo-American thought builds on observations by Henri Bergson, Wahl, and Édouard Le Roy: they recognized its potential to reactivate a philosophical creativity which had been blocked by a sterilized academic discourse.
This dissertation project analyzes the importance of classical American Pragmatism and the closely intertwined “radical empiricism” within the development of French philosophy throughout the 20th century. It aims to study more closely the pragmatist constellations and paths of reception which have so far been easily overlooked, especially when compared to German philosophy. Thus, the project will explore the transatlantic “social life” of ideas with regard to the current renaissance of pragmatism in France, which challenges dominant narratives of national philosophical unity and ultimately reduces them to absurdity.
Publications
“Authorship/s” (with Hannah Wallenfels, Lilja Walliser), in: The Philosopher 110.4 (2022), pp. 7-12.
“‘To make us think, in French, things which were very new.’ Jean Wahl and American Philosophy”, in: Pragmatism and Social Philosophy. American Contributions to a European Discipline, hrsg. von Michael Festl, Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge, 2021, pp. 49-67.
“Everything for Everyone” (with Edna Bonhomme, Sara Morais dos Santos Bruss), in: Nacre Journal 4 (2020), pp. 20-29.
“Vom Nutzen und Nachteil der Philosophiegeschichte für die Philosophie” (with Corinne Kaszner), in: Mitteilungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Philosophie 42 (2018), pp. 2-5.
“‘Everywhere There Are Sad Passions.’ Gilles Deleuze and the Unhappy Consciousness”, in: Deleuze and the Passions, ed. by Sjoerd van Tuinen and Ceciel Meiborg, New York: Punctum Books, 2016, pp. 21-40.