Prof. Dr. Denis Laborde | Forscher
Fachbereich
:
Musikologie
|
former
Abteilung
:
Plateforme « Musique Anthropologie Globalisation »
Biographie
Nach seinem Studium am Conservatoire National Supérieur de Musique in Paris unterrichtete Denis Laborde an Konservatorien und leitete bei Radio France die Uraufführung der Crystal Psalms von Alvin Curran (New Albion Records). Daraufhin entdeckte er die Anthropologie für sich und promovierte an der EHESS zu den poetisch-musikalischen Improvisationen des baskischen Bertsulari (Nicole Belmont). Er wurde Chefredakteur der Zeitschrift Ethnologie française und tritt dem CNRS (LAIOS) bei. Während Aufenthalten in Göttingen (MHFA - Max-Planck-Institut für Geschichte) und Berlin (Centre Marc Bloch) organisierte er ein internationales Forschungsnetzwerk zu Weltmusik. Nach seiner Rückkehr wird er in das Centre Georg Simmel aufgenommen und an der EHESS in die direction d'études gewählt. 2017 gründete er in Bayonne das Institut ARI-CNRS. Seit dem 1. September 2023 ist er Forscher am Centre Marc Bloch (Berlin), wo er das Team "Migration, Mobilität und räumliche Neuordnung" leitet und das IRN des CNRS Of What is Music Capable in Situation of Forced Migration koordiniert. Im Jahr 2020 wurde er mit der Médaille d'argent des CNRS geehrt.
Denis Laborde macht die Musik zu einem Werkzeug für die Analyse menschlicher Gesellschaften. Er konzentriert sich auf die Analyse von Situationen, entlehnt seine theoretischen Grundlagen der Sozialanthropologie und pflegt einen ständigen Dialog mit der Geschichte, der Philosophie und einer pragmatisch inspirierten Soziologie. Im traditionellen baskischen Repertoire wie auch in den Welten des Jazz interessiert er sich dafür, wie ein Musiker oder eine Musikerin die Umwelt als Handlungsressource nutzt. Er zeigt, dass Improvisation weit davon entfernt ist, ein Glücksspiel zu sein, sondern ein Geschicklichkeitsspiel: Man kann sich nicht zum Improvisator machen (La mémoire et l'instant; Thelonious Monk, sculpteur de silence). Sein Interesse an der Situationsanalyse bringt ihn dazu, Situationen mit offenem Konflikt zu hinterfragen, insbesondere Blasphemieanzeigen (Bach in Leipzig, Karfreitag 1729; The unbearable sound: the strange career of musicoclashes, MIT Press; "Ecouter la musique, c'est un grave péché", Genf).
Seine in Deutschland mit Patrice Veit durchgeführten Untersuchungen über Orte der Musik führen ihn zu Arbeiten über Wissensfiguren und kulturelle Einrichtungen. Er koordiniert zu diesen Themen mehrere Veröffentlichungen (Allemagne, l'interrogation, mit Alf Lüdtke; Erinnerung und Gesellschaft, Maurice Halbwachs (1877- 1945) mit Hermann Krapoth; Désirs d'histoire mit Michael Werner; Le Cas Royaumont, Paris).
Schließlich gründete er in Bayonne das ARI-Institut, als die Stadt zum Eingangstor für Migrant*innen wurde: 12.000 Menschen wurden in einem Jahr vor Ort aufgenommen. Das Bedürfnis der Zivilgesellschaft nach Verständlichkeit veranlasste ihn, seine Forschung der Art und Weise zu widmen, wie die Herstellung von Musik diejenigen, die sich in einer Zwangsmigration befinden, auf ihrer Reise begleitet (Migrants Musiciens, Genf): Warum unter solchen Umständen Musik machen? Und was bewirkt diese Herstellung von Musik? Mit dem Institut Convergences Migrations, später mit der Columbia University und dem Center for World Music in Hildesheim, leitet er internationale Projekte zu diesem Thema. Mit seinen Doktoranden schafft er eine originelle Form des wissenschaftlichen Schreibens - das Festival Haizebegi, Art - Science - Société: Konzerte, Filme, Workshops, Kolloquien, Begegnungen, die es Musikern und den unterschiedlichsten Zuschauern ermöglichen, diese libido sciendi zu teilen, die die Forschenden antreibt, die Musik zu einem Werkzeug des Verständnisses der menschlichen Gesellschaften machen.
Institution der Dissertation
(IRN) Musi-Mig: Of What is Music Capable in Situations of Forced Migrations
The great challenge of IRN Musi-Mig is to bring together distant fields of research related to “music” in a shared dynamic of questioning. We bring them together here in the context of the power of music - or, more precisely, of making music together - to affect social bonds in situations of forced migration. We believe that brought together in a shared questioning, these distinct themes can produce the unexpected and be a source of renewed thinking on the role of cultural practices in situations of forced migration on a globalized scale.
We, therefore, target the reasons for acting "in the name of music" and the differentiated modalities of engagement in situations of music making. The basis of the project is a point of method that we have tested in our previous work: an observation work carried out in a contextualized and situated way, which also mobilizes the resources of filmic analysis.
The objective of the IRN
Four work axes are privileged, which draw as many situations or "institutional characters" as we analyze by case. In this context, the disparity of the situations is an asset to think this casuistry and trying to organize a rise in generality from these multi-situated observations, which aim to integrate into our analyses the internationalization of the question of asylum:
- (i) Activist commitments: What is acting in the name of the music? Here we compare situations in which NGOs propose musical activities in conditions of great precariousness: refugee camps (Moria, Zaatari, Kakuma), various CADAs, and reception structures for victims of natural catastrophes (New York). What does the musician's action in common do in these cases? How is the question of musical repertoires considered? Is music a tool for resilience, training, or a tool for cultural domination that would involve the establishment of a process of vicariousness?
- (ii) Cultural facilities have been built to accommodate (and produce) musical diversity. This is the case with the great festivals of Cape Coast, Rudolstadt, Hanover, New York. It is also the case of the buildings dedicated to fabricating a multicultural society. The Fort d'Aubervilliers is a paradigmatic case: an entire urban renovation program is built around the theater, programming, and mediation activities of the Villes des Musiques du Monde festival, which the public authorities have turned into a tool for social inclusion.
- (iii) Creative networks, most of them informal, are creating new urban dynamics centered on the reception and integration of asylum seekers in innovative participative approaches. What impact does this solidarity activism have on the lives of migrants who get involved in a musical project? And how does the social world that accompanies them change? The case studies are in New York, London, Berlin, and San Sebastian.
- (iv) Institutional arrangements. This time we shift our attention to institutions, focusing on the integrative force of cultural and educational policies, considered from the point of view of emotional mobilizations and musical capabilities but also the point of view of the status and legal frameworks of integration through artistic practice.
On each occasion, we examine how music is used to act on situations, to transform them in an inclusive, participatory, and virtuous way. Let us specify that these virtues are not to be sought in the music "itself" (which can also be an instrument of torture) but in the action in common and in the disposition in which the participants find themselves to believe in the virtue of the musical practice (it is up to the researchers to evaluate the criteriology and the forms of implementation in the situations).
The strength of the team
Internationally renowned scientists are part of this network. All the researchers involved in the network have already worked together, and the fieldwork is carried out within the framework of projects that have already been funded. The serialization of these case studies should allow us to lay the foundations for a generalization that will allow us to better grasp the importance of cultural practices in situations of forced migration and to grasp them in a reflexive form that questions the sustainability of social inclusion policies on a now globalized scale.
Activities
We privilege five modes of operation: 1. meetings of the Scientific Council (the project leaders of each team) twice a year at the ARI Institute; 2. an introductory conference explicitly devoted to questions of method and epistemology; 3. four other annual conferences devoted to each of the four themes of this project, organized by the partners; 4. An annual meeting on the theme of Art and Social Sciences to organize the international cooperation that will accompany the broad scientific program to create an incubator for artistic and scientific projects aimed at creating a framework for the ERC Synergy Grant project.
Objective
The IRN will strengthen the incubator for scientific research and artistic creation for cultural projects with a social vocation that is being created in Bayonne. It will ensure an international influence, not only in terms of visibility but also in terms of replicating the modalities of doing research experimentally. The IRN MusiCap will produce: (i) 11 publications over the next 5 years; (ii) a dedicated website with Pic-Digital (France Relance project with the company Pic-Digital); (iii) an involvement in the Haizebegi Festival in order to make this work known (www.haizebegi.eu); (iv) the ARI Institute has a documentary film team under the direction of Alexandra ENA (director, CNRS Image). Short films (5 min.) will be put online on the website, and a 52 minutes documentary film will be made on the project (funding acquired)
The IRN is an unrivalled tool for allowing an internationalization of research for units that are far from the major centers of scientific production.
Team members & Institutes:
FRANCE – Prof. Denis LABORDE, Social Anthropology, Centre Marc Bloch, Berlin ; GHANA – Dr. Eric Debrah OTCHERE, Ethnomusicology, University of Cape Coast, Music and Dance Department Cape Coast; USA – Prof. Alessandra CIUCCI, Ethnomusicology, Columbia University, The Department of Music, New York, USA; GREAT BRITAIN - Prof. Martin STOKES, Ethnomusicology, London University, King’s College, London; GREAT BRITAIN - Dr. Hélène NEVEU KRINGELBACH, Anthropology, University College London, African Studies Research Center Gower Street, London; THE NETHERLANDS – Prof. Robert KLOOSTERMAN, Economic Geography, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research, Amsterdam; GERMANY – Dr. Habil. Michael FUHR, Ethnomusicology, Center for World Music Universität Hildesheim (Germany); SWITZERLAND – Prof. Monika SALZBRUNN, Ethnology, Université de Lausanne, Institut de Sciences Sociales des Religions Anthropole, Lausanne (Suisse) ; SPAIN – Dr. Aitzpea LEIZAOLA, Ethnology, Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea, Saint-Sébastien ; CHILE – Dr. Marisol FACUSE MUÑOZ, Sociology, Universidad de Chile, Santiago de Chile.
Edition: New Diversities
https://newdiversities.mmg.mpg.de/?page_id=22776
https://hal.science/hal-04708375
In three steps, this paper suggests erecting ingenuity as a tool of investigation: Ethnomusicology in migration contexts, Strategies and tactics, Categorical assignments. Ingenuity is not to be understood as a gap in epistemic devices but as an instrument that unleashes the gaze, as a tool that aims to ensure the accuracy of observation reports, and especially as a generator of indignation that may take us out of our “comfort zone.” A comfort zone is to be understood here as a knowledge configuration that encourages us to think from established categories that assign people to the place provided for them by existing devices, forgetting to take into account the ways these categories are instituted. This leads us to pay attention to the “categorical service” that ethnomusicology’s conceptual frameworks provide to our ways of thinking.