Dr. Sara Minelli | Associated Researcher

Critical Thinking in the Plural. Conceptual Approaches in Research in the Social Sciences
Centre Marc Bloch, Friedrichstraße 191, D-10117 Berlin
Email: saraminelli55  ( at )  gmail.com Tel: +49(0) 30 / 20 93 70700

Home Institution : EHESS | Position : Associated Researcher | Disciplines : Philosophy , Political Science |

Biography

2022: PhD thesis: "Politics of Myth in the Twentieth Century, between Fascism and Critique" (EHESS). 

Associated researcher at the Centre Marc Bloch since 2017. Since June 2019: wissenschaftliche Mitarbeiterin at the University of Kiel (CAU), in Political Theory, History of Ideas and Political Culture.

Research interests: philosophies of myth, Critical Theory, history of fascism.


 

CV File
Title of thesis
Politics of Myth in the Twentieth Century, between Fascism and Critique
Summary of thesis

The thesis focuses on the politicisation of myth in the early twentieth century. The notion of myth appears massively in political language at the turn of the century, starting with Romanticism, and is then embraced by the Fascist regimes in Italy and Germany: according to the propaganda, the issue is how to incarnate the myth of the nation, of the “race”, or of the “Third Reich” in social life. Far from being an illusion or a fable, as during the Enlightenment, the myth is now a political reality. The politicisation of the notion of myth coincided with what could be considered a mythisation of politics under fascism, i.e. the setting up of mass gatherings in the form of liturgies, the use of symbols and rites, and the heroisation of the leader. The use of myth as a means to arouse the enthusiasm of the masses, first theorised by Georges Sorel in 1906, thus seems to be the essential element of a new form of politics.Hitherto attributed to the “others”, the so-called “primitives”, and representing the opposite of modern thinking, the myth now expresses, right at a time when the masses are acquiring unprecedented political importance, the imaginary and affective dimension of collective action. At the same time, it is placed at the heart of the fascist ideology. By tracing the history of the notion of myth, the aim of the present work is to reveal this ambivalence, from its emergence to the philosophical critique developed by several authors - from Ernst Bloch to Max Horkheimer and Theodor W. Adorno, or Ernst Cassirer - who seek to understand the mechanisms behind the totalitarian domination over the masses through the use of myth. Based on what Furio Jesi calls the “mythological machine”, I show how myth tends to be hypostasised as a force acting on the “masses”, who then replace the so-called “primitives”. The critique of myth is therefore necessary to understand its role in contemporary history, without at the same time succumbing to its fascination.

Institution of thesis
EHESS
Supervisor
Pierre Bouretz/Paula Diehl
Organisation of Events

10-12. 11. 2022 | « Die Zeit des Populismus », avec Brigitte Bargetz, Paula Diehl, Nina Elena Eggers, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DVPW, en coopération avec la Fondation Heinrich-Böll et l’Institut français de Kiel)

08-09. 04. 2022 | « Penser à partir de ruines : dialectique et politique dans l’idéalisme allemand et la théorie critique », avec Yasmin Afshar, Nicolas Lema, Ernesto Ruiz-Eldredge, Paris 1 Sorbonne, Paris (en coopération avec le Centre Marc Bloch et l'Université de Poitiers)

09-11. 06. 2021 | « Masse und Individuum in der kapitalistischen Moderne / Masse et individu dans la modernité capitaliste / Mass and Individual in Capitalist Modernity », avec Yasmin Afshar, Nicolas Lema, Ernesto Ruiz-Eldredge, Centre Marc Bloch, Berlin (en coopération avec l'Université de Kiel et de Poitiers)

Presentism and non-contemporaneity: A temporal analysis of political transformation

The project looks at the relationship between politics and time. Whereas the term ‘revolution’ etymologically meant a return of the same, in the modern era it indicates the emergence of something new. The hegemonic ‘temporal regime’ of ‘modernity’ is now said to be in crisis. Numerous contemporary diagnoses point to an imprisonment in an extended and frenetic present, with one novelty following another, but no new that is different from what is. The constant acceleration of history leads to the loss of the past and the dissolution of the future. 

However, it is perhaps less a question of a monolithic presentism than of an ‘explosion of the non-contemporary’, as Ernst Bloch already diagnosed in the 1930s. Based on current research into social temporality, the project proposes to link the discursive and structural dimensions of temporality analysis using the concept, inspired by Ernst Bloch, of the ‘non-contemporaneity’ of different political and social rhythms. In this temporal context, the very idea of revolution takes on a different form. In a second moment, contemporary theories of revolutionary action - insurrection, revolt, revolution - are considered in order to analyse them from the point of view of the relationship to time.

Publications

Die Ambivalenz des ‚Mythos‘ als politischer Begriff am Beispiel des Faschismus, in: T. Adler- Bartels, S. Altenburger, V. Frick, T. Schottdorf et T. Stein (hrsg.), Politische Grundbegriffe im 21. Jahrhundert, Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2023.

(with Brigitte Bargetz, Nina Elena Eggers) Das Spiel mit der Zeit: autoritär-populistische Politiken der Vergegenwärtigung, in: theorieblog, Blogpost-Reihe Zeit, 2023, https://www.theorieblog.de/index.php/2023/12/das-spiel-mit-der-zeit-autoritaer-populistische-politiken-der-vergegenwaertigung/. 

(with Kaveh Ghoreishi) Divine violence: Kurdish struggles and general strike, in: Critique of Violence’ 100 years later—On the actuality of Walter Benjamin’s violence essay, Contexto International: journal of global connections, 2023.

Mito, utopia e propaganda : Linguaggio di verità o tecniche di manipolazione?, in Thomas Project. A border journal for utopian thoughts , n.3, “Utopia as a form of life”, 2020. http://www.thomasproject.net/current-issue/

Qu’est-ce qu’un mythe en politique ? Quelques remarques sur l’histoire d’une relation ambiguë, in Trajectoires, 13/2020. http://journals.openedition.org/trajectoires/5156

Freud, Adorno: estudios sobre la estructura pulsional del individuo en la masa (trans. E. Ruiz- Eldredge Molina), in R. Prado, J. A. Paz, E. Ruiz-Eldredge (hrsg.), Iconoclasia. Investigaciones sobre y desde Marx, Lima, 2018.

 

Translations

Furio Jesi, Mythe, La Tempête, 2024 (from Italian, with Benjamin Torterat).

T.W. Adorno, "Sur la Tradition", in: C. David, F. Perrier (hg.), Où en sommes-nous avec la théorie esthétique d’Adorno ?, Pontcerq, Rennes, 2018. (from German, with the Centre Marc Bloch translation collective).

Hans Blumenberg, Prefigurazione. Quando il mito fa la storia, Morcelliana, 2018 (from German).